Is there a relevant international standard? If so, identify the standard: [X] Codex Alimentarius Commission (e.g. title or serial number of Codex standard or related text): Calcium Propionate, prepared at the 49th JECFA(1997) , reviewed and maintained at the 51st JECFA(1998), republished in FNP 52 Add 6 (1998). [ ] World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (e.g. Terrestrial or Aquatic Animal Health Code, chapter number): [ ] International Plant Protection Convention (e.g. ISPM number): [ ] None Does this proposed regulation conform to the relevant international standard? [ ] Yes [X] No If no, describe, whenever possible, how and why it deviates from the international standard: 1. The main content test method was changed from EDTA titration to liquid chromatography. This is because EDTA actually measures the calcium content, and liquid chromatography determines the propionic acid content, which is more scientific. 2. Set heavy metal indicators instead of lead content indicators. There is a correlation between the two indicators, and the heavy metal detection method is more convenient. 3. The drying loss index is 9.5% or less, which is set with reference to JSFA9 and is related to the test temperature. 4. Set the arsenic content index. This is based on JSFA9. 5. Set free acid or free base indicators, but not set pH indicators. This is based on JSFA9. |